Pages

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

You're A Terrible Human Being If You Think Michael Dunn Is Right


The murder of 17-year-old Jordan Davis has often compared with the killing of Trayvon Martin and, on Tuesday, another similarity between the two cases may have popped up.

Just as acquitted Martin killer George Zimmerman recently told CNN's Chris Cuomo that he was the victim, a newly-released phone call between Davis' accused killer Michael Dunn and his fiancée Rhonda Rouer shows the former proclaiming: "I'm the fucking victim here, I was the one who was victimized," adding, "I'm the victor, but I was the victim too." In the newly-released call, recorded a month after his arrest, Dunn continued...* The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

Holly Hughes, a White Lawyer Says – “If Black Men Used ‘Stand Your Ground’ To Justify Killing Teen White Boys, There’d Be A Riot!”


Truth hurts…

Former prosecuting attorney and legal analyst Holly Hughes spoke some hard-hitting truth while recently discussing the verdict in the Michael Dunn trial with CNN journalist Don Lemon.

Hughes, who is white, had this to say in response to child murderer Michael Dunn only being found guilty on four attempted murder charges and acquitted of murder for the senseless killing of unarmed teenager Jordan Davis.

via CNN

Don, let’s just keep it really real.

Us lawyers use this term, we say: “assuming arguendo,” meaning, “how about if it was like this?” Let’s flip this, Don. Let’s say that in the state of Florida, black men were murdering teenage white boys and then when they went to trial, they got acquitted using “Stand Your Ground.”

Do we really think that if that was happening, that they wouldn’t repeal the law or change it? That’s what it comes down to. And you know I’ve heard a lot of people say ‘oh well, you know black men get convicted and that’s the problem./ No, no, no..let’s do exactly the reverse.

Black adult men murdering white boy teenagers in Florida and then getting acquitted? There would be a riot to equal NONE.

They would repeal that law so fast and say “you can’t have “Stand Your Ground” anymore.” So why is it ok in this situation?

If you ask us, she couldn’t have made it anymore plain. Check out the video below of Holly Hughes speaking on the verdict and then let us know your thoughts on her perspective in the comments section.

Holly Hughes, a White Lawyer Says – “If Black Men Used ‘Stand Your Ground’ To Justify Killing Teen White Boys, There’d Be A Riot!”


Truth hurts…

Former prosecuting attorney and legal analyst Holly Hughes spoke some hard-hitting truth while recently discussing the verdict in the Michael Dunn trial with CNN journalist Don Lemon.

Hughes, who is white, had this to say in response to child murderer Michael Dunn only being found guilty on four attempted murder charges and acquitted of murder for the senseless killing of unarmed teenager Jordan Davis.

via CNN

Don, let’s just keep it really real.

Us lawyers use this term, we say: “assuming arguendo,” meaning, “how about if it was like this?” Let’s flip this, Don. Let’s say that in the state of Florida, black men were murdering teenage white boys and then when they went to trial, they got acquitted using “Stand Your Ground.”

Do we really think that if that was happening, that they wouldn’t repeal the law or change it? That’s what it comes down to. And you know I’ve heard a lot of people say ‘oh well, you know black men get convicted and that’s the problem./ No, no, no..let’s do exactly the reverse.

Black adult men murdering white boy teenagers in Florida and then getting acquitted? There would be a riot to equal NONE.

They would repeal that law so fast and say “you can’t have “Stand Your Ground” anymore.” So why is it ok in this situation?

If you ask us, she couldn’t have made it anymore plain. Check out the video below of Holly Hughes speaking on the verdict and then let us know your thoughts on her perspective in the comments section.

“Banished” Documentary Explores Racial Cleansing In America, Entire Neighborhoods Of Blacks Driven From Their Homes!


Never forget. As much as some folks would like Blacks to forget the cruelties of slavery, segregation and racial injustice in America, it’s impossible to forget when things haven’t changed at all in some places. We wanted to call your attention to this documentary which was co-produced by award-winning documentary filmmaker Marco Williams. It explores the cruel practice of racial cleansing throughout the U.S. during the period following the Civil War.

Here’s more info via California Newsreel:

Between 1860 and 1920 hundreds of U.S. counties expelled their black residents. The pattern was depressingly similar in almost all cases. The counties tended to have small, defenseless black populations. A black man was rumored to have assaulted a white woman, was lynched and then white rioters attacked black neighborhoods with guns and firebombs. Few black property owners had time to sell their properties nor dared return to repossess them. Whites could then illegally assume ownership of them. African Americans not only lost their hard-won homes, farms and businesses, but saw their communities and families dispersed and their very right to exist violated. The film reveals that even one hundred years later, these racially cleansed communities tend to remain all-white bastions of separatism, sometimes harboring active klaverns of the Ku Klux Klan. Another California Newsreel release, Trouble Behind documents the same process in Corbin, Kentucky, home of Kentucky Fried Chicken.

Banished first visits Forsyth County, Georgia, now a prosperous suburban sprawl north of Atlanta. In 1912, African Americans were violently driven out; today there is still a saying among black folk: “Don’t let the sun go down on you in Forsyth County.” In 1987 a bi-racial Martin Luther King Celebration tour was organized through the all-white county. Buses filled with marchers were met by angry mobs, led by seven white supremacist groups and a melee ensued. The governor set up a commission to investigate the incident and to respond to black calls that the stolen land be returned to them. We meet the Strickland family as they return to the 2000 acres once owned by their great grandfather and they restore the neglected family burial ground as a “monument to the past.” Although the commission found no deeds for the passage of land from half of the expelled black owners to whites, the white members denied that their community was responsible for any recompense and that statute of limitations had run out for any claims against illegal occupation. The Stricklands were denied not only their land but even the closure that the acknowledgement of past injustices might have given them.

The small, peaceful town of Pierce City, Missouri, banished its African American population in1901; it is still all-white. In 2006, a descendant of one of the expelled families, Charles Brown, decided to exhume the body of his great-grandfather buried in Pierce City and inter it in the family plot in Springfield. He met bureaucratic stone-walling and what emerged as a pattern of denial and avoidance on the part of whites. But the soft-spoken, reasonable Brown persisted and finally convinced the local coroner and a former mayor to help him rebury his ancestor. But when he unexpectedly asked Pierce City to pay the bill as a token of regret for the banishment, the whites felt betrayed, the victims of a “bait and switch.” They offered a transparently hypocritical response: the crimes of 1901 were so horrific that no dollar amount could ever compensate, only trivialize them. Sherrilyn Ifill, Professor of Law at the University of Maryland, stresses that reparations are a continuing process, providing recompense whenever and however it becomes possible.

Finally, Banished travels to Harrison, Arkansas, a small city where a faith-based process for “truth and reconciliation” was initiated, perhaps inspired by the South African example. In 1909, a white mob lynched a black man and then expelled the town’s black citizens. It is still all-white, a Klan stronghold with the Confederate flag flying over the Chamber of Commerce and a refuge for retirees who “who want to live without black people.” A Taskforce for Race Relations was formed to deal with this situation in a “substantive” way. It established two college scholarships for black students to attract them to the local schools, named after Aunt Vine, a maid, who was the only black person allowed to remain in Harrison after 1901. But one of the scholarship recipients observes that Harrison is still a “sundown town;” “black people won’t spend the night in Harrison.” The Taskforce hired a consultant, David Zimmerman, a local historian, who suggested they erect a monument in the city square acknowledging that nearby there once was a flourishing African American community which was destroyed by a white mob. This would provide a public space for acknowledgement, healing and reconciliation but even this modest plan was met with objections.

This is something that should never be forgotten. This is our legacy and our children should know it and understand the history of our struggle and the nature of racism in America.

For more information on Banished and to order a copy visit the film’s website HERE

Marvin Booker's Death: No discipline for deputies



Denver Manager of Safety Charles Garcia cleared five deputies who were involved in a struggle that led to the death of Marvin Booker, and Booker's family is now calling for a federal investigation.

The deputies, who wrestled an agitated Booker to the ground and put him in a chokehold while he was being booked into the Denver jail, used proper tactics to subdue him, Garcia ruled Monday.

"After a thorough review of the investigation and after considering the recommendations of the city's independent monitor, this office concludes that the deputies did not violate the department's use-of-force policy or any other department rules related to use of force," Garcia said.

Frame grabs show the video taken of Marvin Booker.
Frame grabs show the video taken of Marvin Booker. (Special to The Denver Post)
Garcia's decision follows a previous ruling by District Attorney Mitch Morrissey that the deputies broke no laws in the handling of Booker.

Booker's family, which has filed a federal lawsuit against the city, will call this morning for the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate the death, according to a release from their attorneys.

"How is it that officials of this city — Denver Director of Corrections Gary Wilson, Independent Monitor Richard Rosenthal and Manager of Safety Charlie Garcia — could even articulate these officers have not done anything wrong and did not use excessive force?" Booker's brother, Spencer Booker, said after watching the video of his brother's final moments for the first time Monday in the mayor's office. "After a thorough investigation, they found officers did nothing wrong against my brother? It's mind-boggling."

Jeff Dorschner, spokesman for the U.S. attorney's office, said the family's request would be reviewed if received by the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division in Washington and the FBI.

Video of struggle released

Though Garcia found that the deputies did not violate policy in handling Booker, the Sheriff Department has decided to ban the use of the carotid restraint, or choke hold, that may have contributed to Booker's death in the early-morning hours of July 9 last year.

"The Denver Sheriff Department will organize a use-of-force task force that will include department and community stakeholders as well as the office of the independent monitor to fully review the DSD use-of-force policies," Wilson said.

A new policy also calls for removing officers from their line assignment when an in-custody death results after force is applied. Deputies involved in Booker's death initially remained on the job in the days following it.

Video of Booker's last moments alive was released Monday after months of calls to make it public. It shows an agitated Booker pulling away from Deputy Faun Gomez as she tries to lead him to a holding cell after he refused to take a seat for booking on a charge of failing to appear in court on a drug paraphernalia charge.

It escalates from there, as Deputies James Grimes, Ken Robinette and Kyle Sharp joined Gomez in wrestling Booker to the ground. Sgt. Carrie Rodriguez also runs over to observe and supervise the incident, the report said.

A report by Garcia said deputies were surprised by the strength of Booker, 56 years old and about 135 pounds. They were also surprised he didn't stop resisting even after he was handcuffed and in a choke hold that was released at regular intervals to make sure he was still breathing.

It's only after he is shocked for eight seconds with a Taser that Booker stops resisting. Deputies said they believed he was still conscious but was finally letting them carry him to the cell, where he was placed face down. Some inmates interviewed during the investigation said they thought Booker had gone limp, and they believed he was dead by the time he was carried to the cell.

Death "was not intended"

The coroner — who determined Booker died of "cardiorespiratory arrest during physical restraint" but added that he had cocaine in his bloodstream at nontoxic levels — was unable to determine precisely when he died. But Booker never recovered after he was placed in the cell, and jail nurses' efforts to revive him did not succeed.

Garcia's report places the blame on Booker, much as Morrissey did in finding the deputies broke no laws. Booker was waiting to be booked in an area called the Cooperative Seating Area, where people being booked or waiting to make bail are allowed to remain as long as they follow instructions.

When Booker, who was trying to retrieve his shoes, became belligerent with Gomez, deputies had no choice but to intervene and use the techniques they had been taught until Booker stopped resisting — for the protection of other inmates and themselves, Garcia said in the report.

"No doubt the death of Mr. Booker is tragic," Garcia wrote. "It was not intended by anyone."

Profiling worries black community

By Bryna Godar


 When Chisom Esele walks around the University of Minnesota campus at night, people sometimes get nervous, walk faster or cross the street when they see him coming.

“I feel like when you're black and you’re walking on the street at night, you're kind of viewed [in a certain way],” the electrical engineering junior said. “I kind of understand, but at the end of the day, when this kind of stuff happens to me … it affects the way I feel.”

With the recent string of crime alerts emailed to University students, faculty and staff, the black community has an additional safety concern: racial profiling.

All but two of the 19 crimes in alerts sent this semester have described one or more young, black males as suspects. The other two didn’t include race descriptions.

“The problem is that it’s not descriptive enough to say who they’re actually looking for, because a black male in their 20s is me, and I’m a professional staff member here,” said Black Faculty and Staff Association logistics and technology coordinator Delonte LeFlore.

Black faculty, staff and students across the University are working with police, administrators and the campus community to address the growing safety issue. They say they are worried about racial profiling by police, racial fear in the community and the potential for the situation to escalate into racially based violence.

“Our big question is, how do you keep this campus safe from crime while also keeping people of color, particularly ... black men, safe from racial profiling,” said BFSA President Alysia Lajune.

Calling for ‘urgent’ University response

A month after meeting with University police Chief Greg Hestness to discuss the impact of the crime alerts and steps to address racial profiling, members of the University’s black community said they haven't seen a change.

Six groups sent a letter to President Eric Kaler and University Services Vice President Pam Wheelock on Friday, asking University police to work with the groups, and provided a list of recommendations to address racial profiling.

The primary recommendations involve posting the University police department’s policy on racial or bias-based profiling on its website, sending a University-wide email detailing the policy and including the policy in crime alerts.

After receiving the letter Friday, University Services spokesman Tim Busse said those requests will be in place by the end of the day Monday.

The BFSA, the Black Graduate and Professional Students Association, the Black Men’s Forum, the Black Student Union, the African American & African Studies department and Huntley House for African American Men all signed the letter.

University police policy defines racial or bias profiling as “any action initiated by law enforcement that relies on the race, ethnicity or national origin of an individual rather than the behavior of that individual.”

“I think our University officers do a very good job fighting against the notion of racial profiling,” Busse said. “Their policy is to profile behavior and not race.”

University police began logging extra overtime in October in response to the recent crimes around campus, according to an email Wheelock sent to the University community.

Addressing the Faculty Senate on Thursday, Kaler said the “aggressive law enforcement” is paying off but that the current strategy can raise concerns about racial profiling.

“I am confident that the law enforcement strategy we’re pursuing is the right one to curb crime,” he said at the meeting. “But it will take time to see sustained results, and we need to remain vigilant to not profile based on race.”

But the University’s black community is concerned about the increased police presence.

BFSA treasurer Bereket Worku said police have pulled over both he and LeFlore in the area for “no reason.”

Lajune said she always checks her speedometer when she sees a police car in order to “not give a reason to be pulled over.”

Black Men’s Forum President Ian Taylor Jr. said a petition to increase police presence bothers him “because usually when there’s an increase in police presence, it’s not very good for black people in general.”

‘Vague’ suspect descriptions

Black students, faculty and staff agreed that the string of suspect descriptions have created an unsafe environment for them.

“What it’s doing to us is it’s painting us as threats to everyone,” said Black Men’s Forum Vice President Abdel-Kader Toovi. “They’re not separating the black men on campus from these out-of-campus people coming in.”

The letter sent Friday recommends removing race descriptions from crime alerts, because the Jeanne Clery Act, which requires the University to send crime alerts, doesn’t mandate them.

“What we’re saying is UMPD needs to know the full description, but the University community’s job is not to be volunteer police officers and help you catch criminals,” Lajune said. “So how important is it that we have these descriptions?”

Mechanical engineering senior Joseph Lee said he thinks the descriptions aid in identifying suspects.

“Without a description, you lose the power of the public,” he said. “I don’t think racial profiling is perpetrated by the description but by people’s interpretation of that.”

Busse said the alerts aim to help individuals identify suspects and either bring that information to police or use it to stay safe.

“We’re trying to give enough information that if someone saw that person walking down the street, they could recognize them and react appropriately,” he said.

For now, Busse said, he thinks the alerts should still include suspect descriptions.

But many are concerned the descriptions are too vague.

“Every time I see a description, I can think of 10 people that fit that description,” Worku said.

Particularly in light of discussions of the right to conceal and carry, some worry the campus climate could become hostile.

“What many in the black community fear is this could spiral out of control,” Taylor said. “We want to stop it before it gets to that point.”

Moving forward

As the University heads into spring semester, these groups are planning to work with police and administration on events and education to address the issue on campus and throughout the Twin Cities.

“Racial profiling is not just something that police officers do; it’s something that everybody does,” LeFlore said.

Even before the crime alerts, black men have had to move carefully, Taylor said.

“There definitely is this reaction: You don’t want people to feel threatened by you,” Taylor said. “As black men, we don’t want to have to worry about that ... but it’s just the reality.”

Sometimes that means smiling more or crossing to the other side of the street if walking behind somebody, he said.

“They feel like they have to adjust themselves, and that’s disturbing to me as well,” Taylor said. “It’s reminiscent of Jim Crow [laws] ... when there’s social standards you must operate by.”

Lajune said the groups want to open discussion, allowing people to “step up to the mic” and share their stories.

BSU President Amber Jones said the administration should have the same urgency regarding concerns of racial profiling that it’s had addressing campus safety.

“This has to be a part of the conversation,” she said.

The letter sent Friday also recommended that UMPD work on relationship-building activities with black students and that administrators engage in a listening session.

The groups hope to engage the Minneapolis and St. Paul police departments as well, because they handle most off-campus crime.

“This is the start of the discussion of how we can attack it as a whole in all three areas,” LeFlore said.

Busse said University officials, including police Chief Hestness and University Services Vice President Wheelock will discuss the other recommendations.

“I'm disturbed with the climate on campus,” Taylor said. “I think there’s a lot of potential in this moment to increase the way we can make our community safer.”

Update: Feds Take Over Alfred Wright Case

Florida Ku Klux Klan Leader Reveals Police And Judges Are In Support Of ...

Outrage After 'Loud Music' Murder Verdict Splits CNN, Fox Hosts


CNN Host Don Lemon was outraged after the attempted murder verdict in the Michael Dunn 'loud music' trial. How did Fox News anchor Gregg Jarrett respond via Twitter? The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.

Michael Dunn Convicted Of Attempted Murder In 'Loud Music' Trial


"A jury on Saturday night convicted a Florida man on four charges related to his shooting into an SUV full of teenagers during an argument over loud music, but could not decide on the most serious charge -- murder. Michael Dunn was found guilty on four charges, including three for attempted second-degree murder, which could land him behind bars for decades. Yet there was no verdict on the first-degree murder charge tied to the death of 17-year-old Jordan Davis...".* The Young Turks host Cenk Uygur breaks it down.